The goal of most study is mastery not 80%. If mastery is your goal 80% of your way to the goal would be a failure condition. In other words the Pareto principle is accepting of “almost”; education rarely is. From the individual point of view “almost” is like birth control that is 80% effective. A disaster in other words.
Every student I’ve ever taught would probably have been happy if they could have even managed to reach 80%. An achievable 80% would be infinitely preferable to sticking at A2 – B1, failing CAE and feeling fluency will elude you forever. Aiming for 80, the students might be motivated to achieve the other 20 alone, assuming anyone can say what the 100 looks or feels like!
I don’t think most language learners are really aiming for 100% mastery – in fact, many would consider that an impossible goal. 80% of the way there would be a great achievement, and surely better than most people manage. But, of course 80% will mean different things to different people.
I think those who study for years at get stuck at intermediate level are applying the 20/80 rule.
Hi Tim I think you raised a good question, and I like the ‘Why?’ from Michael. I am wondering if 80/20 in ELT is a little different from education in general? If we look at the goal as communication in English, then perhaps achieving this goal with 80% accuracy is a lot? To continue your idea about this principle in ELT, would like to add about the 20%: content, time, effort, materials used?
We were not talking about the learner getting to 80% to his or her goal. We were talking about whether we could reach 80% of our goal by investing our time in just 20% of the content.
This site uses cookies to perform analytics and improve your browsing experience. Learn MoreGot it!
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Short and to the point. I’d say you got across 80% of everything you could have said in only 20% of the time. Well done, and thanks.
Perhaps, but why?
The goal of most study is mastery not 80%. If mastery is your goal 80% of your way to the goal would be a failure condition. In other words the Pareto principle is accepting of “almost”; education rarely is. From the individual point of view “almost” is like birth control that is 80% effective. A disaster in other words.
Every student I’ve ever taught would probably have been happy if they could have even managed to reach 80%. An achievable 80% would be infinitely preferable to sticking at A2 – B1, failing CAE and feeling fluency will elude you forever. Aiming for 80, the students might be motivated to achieve the other 20 alone, assuming anyone can say what the 100 looks or feels like!
I don’t think most language learners are really aiming for 100% mastery – in fact, many would consider that an impossible goal. 80% of the way there would be a great achievement, and surely better than most people manage. But, of course 80% will mean different things to different people.
I think those who study for years at get stuck at intermediate level are applying the 20/80 rule.
I strongly disagree with the suggestion that the goal of most study is mastery, eespecially when it comes to language learning.
Hi Tim
I think you raised a good question, and I like the ‘Why?’ from Michael. I am wondering if 80/20 in ELT is a little different from education in general? If we look at the goal as communication in English, then perhaps achieving this goal with 80% accuracy is a lot?
To continue your idea about this principle in ELT, would like to add about the 20%: content, time, effort, materials used?
We were not talking about the learner getting to 80% to his or her goal. We were talking about whether we could reach 80% of our goal by investing our time in just 20% of the content.
I somehow missed Nick’s original post so thanks for leading me back to that. Both the post and this infographic are really worth thinking about.